Your comments
Swish is not the answer in my opinion for any large clubs internal tournaments and events. How can a desired feature be the number 1 item on the idea board for 8 years and still not be in development. Is Court Reserve focused on club management to the detriment of organized activities?
When using 1up/down, inactive players movement down is inconstant, only based only if they need to be pushed down. Instead all players should be moved down a fixed number of spots.
There needs to be more options than just 1up/down. Why limit it to just 2?
Agree, perhaps the tie breaker should be head to head results. When players are fighting for each point, to often lesser players are the exclusive target. We want more games to be 11-10 rather than 11-0.
At best the opt-in/opt-out default should be an option setting. Our leagues have almost 100 players each session and we need them to opt-in if they are playing that week.
We have the same issue needing to split a session into multiple time slots the same day.
If you want a waitlist handler for the opt-in capability, similar to registration, I agree completely We have large league events of 80 players (max opt-in) and max registration of 95, to insure we fill the opt-ins. A auto fill for the opt-in waitlist would help a lot.
Need to have custom automatic emails specifically for league play, such as event reminders.
Customer support service by UserEcho
Thanks for the update Jeff, but the question remains, when can we expect the round robin manager, if this is required to be developed before the tournament manager. It appears Court Reserve has lost interest in developing event software.